<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>weirdproductreviews.com &#187; FCC</title>
	<atom:link href="http://weirdproductreviews.com/tag/fcc/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://weirdproductreviews.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 00:03:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Apple Magic Trackpad official, shipping now for $69</title>
		<link>http://weirdproductreviews.com/apple-magic-trackpad-official-shipping-now-for-69/</link>
		<comments>http://weirdproductreviews.com/apple-magic-trackpad-official-shipping-now-for-69/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 13:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Vlad Savov</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aluminum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[app]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Engadget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fairy dust]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FCC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ios]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[multitouch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[receptacle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[store]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[today]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[touch input]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unveiling]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/27/apple-magic-trackpad-officially-unveiled/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
It's not like Apple could very well keep it a secret anymore, so today we're being treated to the official unveiling of the Magic Trackpad. This wireless touch input receptacle -- already thoroughly leaked, trademarked, and FCC-approved -- has just ma...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fweirdproductreviews.com%2Fapple-magic-trackpad-official-shipping-now-for-69%2F"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fweirdproductreviews.com%2Fapple-magic-trackpad-official-shipping-now-for-69%2F&amp;source=weirdproducts&amp;style=normal&amp;service_api=9a2672c57b911d5d8ce5a812b8d3995d" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<div style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/27/apple-magic-trackpad-officially-unveiled/"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/07/10x072792ub34efgfg.jpg" /></a></div>
<p>It&#8217;s not like Apple could very well keep it a secret anymore, so today we&#8217;re being treated to the official unveiling of the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/MagicTrackpad/">Magic Trackpad</a>. This wireless touch input receptacle &#8212; already thoroughly <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/07/apples-magic-trackpad-revealed/">leaked</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/28/apple-files-for-magic-trackpad-trademark/">trademarked</a>, and <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/19/apples-magic-trackpad-gets-fcc-approval/">FCC-approved</a> &#8212; has just made its debut in, of all places, Apple&#8217;s <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/15/apple-store-app-arrives-in-apple-app-store/">Store app</a> for iOS 4. It&#8217;s basically exactly what you&#8217;d expect: a glass-covered, aluminum-shelled replicator of the glorious multitouch experience on offer in Apple&#8217;s MacBooks, only for the desktop. The Trackpad is <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/27/apple-battery-charger-gets-official-a-battery-charger-only-you/">battery-powered</a>, communicates via Bluetooth fairy dust, and is ready to ship out right this minute for a dollar under 70 bucks.
<div class="postgallery">
<p><strong>Gallery: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/apple-magic-trackpad-2/">Apple Magic Trackpad</a></strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/apple-magic-trackpad-2/#3208752"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/07/magictrackpadg07272010_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/apple-magic-trackpad-2/#3208754"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/07/trackpad207202010_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/apple-magic-trackpad-2/#3208755"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/07/trackpad520100727_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/apple-magic-trackpad-2/#3208756"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/07/trackpad420100727_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/apple-magic-trackpad-2/#3208757"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/07/trackpad220100727_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a></div>
<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/27/apple-magic-trackpad-officially-unveiled/">Apple Magic Trackpad official, shipping now for $69</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Tue, 27 Jul 2010 08:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p>
<h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6>
<p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/27/apple-magic-trackpad-officially-unveiled/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19560680/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/27/apple-magic-trackpad-officially-unveiled/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://weirdproductreviews.com/apple-magic-trackpad-official-shipping-now-for-69/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>$149 WiFi-only Nook confirmed, 3G price dropped to $199 (update: official)</title>
		<link>http://weirdproductreviews.com/149-wifi-only-nook-confirmed-3g-price-dropped-to-199-update-official/</link>
		<comments>http://weirdproductreviews.com/149-wifi-only-nook-confirmed-3g-price-dropped-to-199-update-official/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jun 2010 12:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Vlad Savov</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[barnes and noble]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[best buy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cellular connection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[connection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e reader]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Engadget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FCC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[firmware version]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[use]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[version]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[way]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WiFi]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/21/149-99-wifi-only-nook-confirmed-by-best-buy-listing/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Turns out all our snooping was spot on with this one. We first spotted a simpler, cheaper Nook making its way through the FCC late last month, and then only last night we got tipped off to a $150 price point for the e-reader sans cellular connection. ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fweirdproductreviews.com%2F149-wifi-only-nook-confirmed-3g-price-dropped-to-199-update-official%2F"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fweirdproductreviews.com%2F149-wifi-only-nook-confirmed-3g-price-dropped-to-199-update-official%2F&amp;source=weirdproducts&amp;style=normal&amp;service_api=9a2672c57b911d5d8ce5a812b8d3995d" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<div style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/21/149-99-wifi-only-nook-confirmed-by-best-buy-listing/"><img hspace="4" border="0" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/06/10x0612oub235bebe.jpg" alt="" /></a></div>
<p>Turns out all our snooping was spot on with this one. We first spotted a simpler, cheaper Nook making its way through the FCC <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/28/wifi-only-nook-gets-fcc-approval/">late last month</a>, and then only last night we got tipped off to a <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/20/wifi-only-nook-surfaces-in-barnes-and-noble-database-costs-149/">$150 price point</a> for the e-reader sans cellular connection. Now Best Buy has confirmed the whole thing with its listing of the BNRV100 model, which comes in over $100 cheaper than Barnes and Noble&#8217;s original ($259), although Best Buy has seen fit to give that a price trim as well. We like where this is going, especially if it triggers B&amp;N&#8217;s competitors to lower their own fees.</p>
<p>[Thanks, Paul]</p>
<p><strong>Update:</strong> Barnes and Noble has now <a href="http://www.barnesandnobleinc.com/press_releases/2010_june_21_nook_wifi.html">gone fully official</a> with its new $149 Nook. The 3G version has taken a price drop to $199 as well, matching the pricing indicated by Best Buy. B&amp;N is today also outing its <a href="http://www.barnesandnoble.com/nook/support/">firmware version 1.4</a>, which allows the free use of AT&amp;T wireless hotspots everywhere.
<p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/21/149-99-wifi-only-nook-confirmed-by-best-buy-listing/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>$149 WiFi-only Nook confirmed, 3G price dropped to $199 (update: official)</em></a></p>
<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/21/149-99-wifi-only-nook-confirmed-by-best-buy-listing/">$149 WiFi-only Nook confirmed, 3G price dropped to $199 (update: official)</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Mon, 21 Jun 2010 07:44:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p>
<h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6>
<p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/21/149-99-wifi-only-nook-confirmed-by-best-buy-listing/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19524095/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/21/149-99-wifi-only-nook-confirmed-by-best-buy-listing/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://weirdproductreviews.com/149-wifi-only-nook-confirmed-3g-price-dropped-to-199-update-official/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>HTC EVO 4G earns FCC&#8217;s blessing, WiMAX and all</title>
		<link>http://weirdproductreviews.com/htc-evo-4g-earns-fccs-blessing-wimax-and-all/</link>
		<comments>http://weirdproductreviews.com/htc-evo-4g-earns-fccs-blessing-wimax-and-all/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 May 2010 23:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Ziegler</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[4g]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[clearwire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Engadget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EVO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[external photos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FCC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fcc documents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fri]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[latter word]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LTE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nbsp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sprint]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WiMAX]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/07/htc-evo-4g-earns-fccs-blessing-wimax-and-all/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/07/htc-evo-4g-earns-fccs-blessing-wimax-and-all/"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/05/htc-evo-4g-fcc-id.jpg" /></a></div>
Looking at hundreds of FCC documents each and every week, it's pretty difficult for us to get too excited about any particular filing, but there are two words that do it for us each and every time: "LTE" and "WiMAX." In this case, the latter word caught our eye all throughout the filing for HTC model PC36100, which runs WiMAX on Sprint's (and Clearwire's) 2500MHz band alongside the standard suite of CDMA bands with EV-DO. In other words, folks, yes -- it's true -- you're looking at the frickin' <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/EVO4G/">EVO 4G</a> for Sprint. There's not much to see here, really; it's still under confidentiality for the external photos, but at least they've cleared that all-important FCC hurdle on the way to retail, which will be... soon, Sprint? Right? Please?<div class="postgallery"><p><strong>Gallery: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/htc-evo-4g-earns-fccs-blessing-wimax-and-all/">HTC EVO 4G earns FCC's blessing, WiMAX and all</a></strong></p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/htc-evo-4g-earns-fccs-blessing-wimax-and-all/#2964208"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/05/htcevo4g2010-05-07-0_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" /></a><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/htc-evo-4g-earns-fccs-blessing-wimax-and-all/#2964209"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/05/htcevo4g2010-05-07-1_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" /></a><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/htc-evo-4g-earns-fccs-blessing-wimax-and-all/#2964210"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/05/htcevo4g2010-05-07-2_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" /></a><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/htc-evo-4g-earns-fccs-blessing-wimax-and-all/#2964211"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/05/htcevo4g2010-05-07-3_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" /></a><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/htc-evo-4g-earns-fccs-blessing-wimax-and-all/#2964212"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/05/htcevo4g2010-05-07-4_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" /></a></div><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/07/htc-evo-4g-earns-fccs-blessing-wimax-and-all/">HTC EVO 4G earns FCC's blessing, WiMAX and all</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Fri, 07 May 2010 18:22:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both;padding: 8px 0 0 0;height: 2px;font-size: 1px;border: 0;margin: 0;padding: 0"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/07/htc-evo-4g-earns-fccs-blessing-wimax-and-all/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&#160;&#124;&#160;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19469481/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&#160;&#124;&#160;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/07/htc-evo-4g-earns-fccs-blessing-wimax-and-all/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fweirdproductreviews.com%2Fhtc-evo-4g-earns-fccs-blessing-wimax-and-all%2F"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fweirdproductreviews.com%2Fhtc-evo-4g-earns-fccs-blessing-wimax-and-all%2F&amp;source=weirdproducts&amp;style=normal&amp;service_api=9a2672c57b911d5d8ce5a812b8d3995d" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<div style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/07/htc-evo-4g-earns-fccs-blessing-wimax-and-all/"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/05/htc-evo-4g-fcc-id.jpg" /></a></div>
<p>Looking at hundreds of FCC documents each and every week, it&#8217;s pretty difficult for us to get too excited about any particular filing, but there are two words that do it for us each and every time: &#8220;LTE&#8221; and &#8220;WiMAX.&#8221; In this case, the latter word caught our eye all throughout the filing for HTC model PC36100, which runs WiMAX on Sprint&#8217;s (and Clearwire&#8217;s) 2500MHz band alongside the standard suite of CDMA bands with EV-DO. In other words, folks, yes &#8212; it&#8217;s true &#8212; you&#8217;re looking at the frickin&#8217; <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/EVO4G/">EVO 4G</a> for Sprint. There&#8217;s not much to see here, really; it&#8217;s still under confidentiality for the external photos, but at least they&#8217;ve cleared that all-important FCC hurdle on the way to retail, which will be&#8230; soon, Sprint? Right? Please?
<div class="postgallery">
<p><strong>Gallery: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/htc-evo-4g-earns-fccs-blessing-wimax-and-all/">HTC EVO 4G earns FCC&#8217;s blessing, WiMAX and all</a></strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/htc-evo-4g-earns-fccs-blessing-wimax-and-all/#2964208"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/05/htcevo4g2010-05-07-0_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/htc-evo-4g-earns-fccs-blessing-wimax-and-all/#2964209"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/05/htcevo4g2010-05-07-1_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/htc-evo-4g-earns-fccs-blessing-wimax-and-all/#2964210"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/05/htcevo4g2010-05-07-2_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/htc-evo-4g-earns-fccs-blessing-wimax-and-all/#2964211"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/05/htcevo4g2010-05-07-3_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/htc-evo-4g-earns-fccs-blessing-wimax-and-all/#2964212"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/05/htcevo4g2010-05-07-4_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a></div>
<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/07/htc-evo-4g-earns-fccs-blessing-wimax-and-all/">HTC EVO 4G earns FCC&#8217;s blessing, WiMAX and all</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Fri, 07 May 2010 18:22:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p>
<h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6>
<p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/07/htc-evo-4g-earns-fccs-blessing-wimax-and-all/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19469481/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/07/htc-evo-4g-earns-fccs-blessing-wimax-and-all/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://weirdproductreviews.com/htc-evo-4g-earns-fccs-blessing-wimax-and-all/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Logitech Squeezebox Touch review</title>
		<link>http://weirdproductreviews.com/logitech-squeezebox-touch-review/</link>
		<comments>http://weirdproductreviews.com/logitech-squeezebox-touch-review/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Apr 2010 16:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tim Stevens</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[addition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[capacitive touchscreen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Engadget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FCC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fingerprints]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hallowed place]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[inch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nbsp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[radio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[road]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Touch]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/19/logitech-squeezebox-touch-review/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Logitech's touch-sensitive addition to the Squeezebox family, aptly named the Touch, has taken a long and hard road to retail. First uncovered by the FCC almost a year ago, announced by Logitech back in September of 2009, and then delayed again and ag...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fweirdproductreviews.com%2Flogitech-squeezebox-touch-review%2F"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fweirdproductreviews.com%2Flogitech-squeezebox-touch-review%2F&amp;source=weirdproducts&amp;style=normal&amp;service_api=9a2672c57b911d5d8ce5a812b8d3995d" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<div style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/19/logitech-squeezebox-touch-review"><img hspace="4" border="1" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/04/squeezebox-touch-20100419-600-09.jpg" /></a></div>
<p>Logitech&#8217;s touch-sensitive addition to the Squeezebox family, aptly named the Touch, has taken a long and hard road to retail. First <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/23/logitech-prepping-squeezebox-updates/">uncovered by the FCC</a> almost a year ago, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/03/logitech-makes-squeezebox-radio-and-touch-official/">announced by Logitech</a> back in September of 2009, and then delayed <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/10/squeezebox-touch-delayed-until-february-bah-humbug/">again</a> and <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/05/logitech-squeezebox-touch-delayed-again/">again</a>, we&#8217;ve finally managed lay our hands on one and, more importantly, start putting some fingerprints on its 4.3-inch capacitive touchscreen. Does it deserve a hallowed place in the Squeezebox canon and, more importantly, is it worth the $299 &#8212; $100 more than the Squeezebox Radio we <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/06/logitech-squeezebox-radio-review/">reviewed last year</a>? Those answers and more after the break.</p>
<div class="postgallery">
<p><strong>Gallery: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/logitech-squeezebox-touch-unboxing/">Logitech Squeezebox Touch unboxing</a></strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/logitech-squeezebox-touch-unboxing/#2906165"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/04/squeezebox-touch-20100419-800-01_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/logitech-squeezebox-touch-unboxing/#2906166"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/04/squeezebox-touch-20100419-800-02_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/logitech-squeezebox-touch-unboxing/#2906167"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/04/squeezebox-touch-20100419-800-03_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/logitech-squeezebox-touch-unboxing/#2906168"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/04/squeezebox-touch-20100419-800-04_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/logitech-squeezebox-touch-unboxing/#2906169"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/04/squeezebox-touch-20100419-800-05_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a></div>
<p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/19/logitech-squeezebox-touch-review/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Logitech Squeezebox Touch review</em></a></p>
<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/19/logitech-squeezebox-touch-review/">Logitech Squeezebox Touch review</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Mon, 19 Apr 2010 11:14:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p>
<h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6>
<p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/19/logitech-squeezebox-touch-review/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19445069/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/19/logitech-squeezebox-touch-review/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://weirdproductreviews.com/logitech-squeezebox-touch-review/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Court rules FCC doesn&#8217;t have authority to impose net neutrality</title>
		<link>http://weirdproductreviews.com/court-rules-fcc-doesnt-have-authority-to-impose-net-neutrality/</link>
		<comments>http://weirdproductreviews.com/court-rules-fcc-doesnt-have-authority-to-impose-net-neutrality/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Apr 2010 16:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nilay Patel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[authority]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[District of Columbia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Engadget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[enormous benefits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FCC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet service providers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal foundation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[minutae]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[minutiae]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nbsp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[net neutrality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[neutrality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[open internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[policy statements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[us court of appeals]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/06/court-rules-the-fcc-doesnt-have-authority-to-impose-net-neutral/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: left"><a href="http://finance.yahoo.com/news/US-court-rules-against-FCC-on-apf-78990100.html?x=0&#38;.v=4"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="left" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/mobile.engadget.com/media/2007/05/fcclogo-2.jpg" /></a>No hard details yet, but opponents of <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/netneutrality">net neutrality</a> just scored a big victory -- the US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia has sided with Comcast and ruled that the FCC doesn't have the authority under current law to impose regulations on internet service providers. Obviously we're super interested in the wonky minutiae, so we'll be digging for them -- stay tuned.<br />
<br />
<strong>Update:</strong> Okay, we're reading the opinion (PDF below) and basically it boils down like this: the FCC ordered Comcast to <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/27/comcast-lays-off-bittorrent-will-continue-to-manage-internet-tr/">stop filtering Bittorrent</a> on its network in early 2008, and Comcast filed suit, saying the FCC didn't have the authority to intervene like that. Since there's no specific law giving the FCC the authority to regulate the internet, the FCC told the court it was using its "ancillary powers," which allow the agency to take actions needed to fulfill its role -- and the FCC was interpreting its role as promoting net neutrality based on the policy statements of Congress. The court said that wasn't good enough, obviously -- we'd bet this gets appealed immediately while Congress goes to work on a specific law authorizing the Commission to impose net neutrality.<br />
<br />
Update 2: Here's the FCC's response to the opinion:</div>
<blockquote>
<div style="text-align: left">The FCC is firmly committed to promoting an open Internet and to policies that will bring the enormous benefits of broadband to all Americans. It will rest these policies -- all of which will be designed to foster innovation and investment while protecting and empowering consumers -- on a solid legal foundation.<br />
Today's court decision invalidated the prior Commission's approach to preserving an open Internet. But the Court in no way disagreed with the importance of preserving a free and open Internet; nor did it close the door to other methods for achieving this important end.</div>
</blockquote><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/06/court-rules-the-fcc-doesnt-have-authority-to-impose-net-neutral/">Court rules FCC doesn't have authority to impose net neutrality</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Tue, 06 Apr 2010 11:16:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both;padding: 8px 0 0 0;height: 2px;font-size: 1px;border: 0;margin: 0;padding: 0"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/06/court-rules-the-fcc-doesnt-have-authority-to-impose-net-neutral/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&#160;&#124;&#160;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19428357/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&#160;&#124;&#160;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/06/court-rules-the-fcc-doesnt-have-authority-to-impose-net-neutral/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fweirdproductreviews.com%2Fcourt-rules-fcc-doesnt-have-authority-to-impose-net-neutrality%2F"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fweirdproductreviews.com%2Fcourt-rules-fcc-doesnt-have-authority-to-impose-net-neutrality%2F&amp;source=weirdproducts&amp;style=normal&amp;service_api=9a2672c57b911d5d8ce5a812b8d3995d" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<div style="text-align: left;"><a href="http://finance.yahoo.com/news/US-court-rules-against-FCC-on-apf-78990100.html?x=0&amp;.v=4"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="left" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/mobile.engadget.com/media/2007/05/fcclogo-2.jpg" /></a>No hard details yet, but opponents of <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/netneutrality">net neutrality</a> just scored a big victory &#8212; the US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia has sided with Comcast and ruled that the FCC doesn&#8217;t have the authority under current law to impose regulations on internet service providers. Obviously we&#8217;re super interested in the wonky minutiae, so we&#8217;ll be digging for them &#8212; stay tuned.</p>
<p><strong>Update:</strong> Okay, we&#8217;re reading the opinion (PDF below) and basically it boils down like this: the FCC ordered Comcast to <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/27/comcast-lays-off-bittorrent-will-continue-to-manage-internet-tr/">stop filtering Bittorrent</a> on its network in early 2008, and Comcast filed suit, saying the FCC didn&#8217;t have the authority to intervene like that. Since there&#8217;s no specific law giving the FCC the authority to regulate the internet, the FCC told the court it was using its &#8220;ancillary powers,&#8221; which allow the agency to take actions needed to fulfill its role &#8212; and the FCC was interpreting its role as promoting net neutrality based on the policy statements of Congress. The court said that wasn&#8217;t good enough, obviously &#8212; we&#8217;d bet this gets appealed immediately while Congress goes to work on a specific law authorizing the Commission to impose net neutrality.</p>
<p>Update 2: Here&#8217;s the FCC&#8217;s response to the opinion:</p></div>
<blockquote>
<div style="text-align: left;">The FCC is firmly committed to promoting an open Internet and to policies that will bring the enormous benefits of broadband to all Americans. It will rest these policies &#8212; all of which will be designed to foster innovation and investment while protecting and empowering consumers &#8212; on a solid legal foundation.<br />
Today&#8217;s court decision invalidated the prior Commission&#8217;s approach to preserving an open Internet. But the Court in no way disagreed with the importance of preserving a free and open Internet; nor did it close the door to other methods for achieving this important end.</div>
</blockquote>
<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/06/court-rules-the-fcc-doesnt-have-authority-to-impose-net-neutral/">Court rules FCC doesn&#8217;t have authority to impose net neutrality</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Tue, 06 Apr 2010 11:16:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p>
<h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6>
<p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/06/court-rules-the-fcc-doesnt-have-authority-to-impose-net-neutral/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19428357/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/06/court-rules-the-fcc-doesnt-have-authority-to-impose-net-neutral/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://weirdproductreviews.com/court-rules-fcc-doesnt-have-authority-to-impose-net-neutrality/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sprint Airave gets remixed by Airvana, has VoIP landline and EV-DO support</title>
		<link>http://weirdproductreviews.com/sprint-airave-gets-remixed-by-airvana-has-voip-landline-and-ev-do-support/</link>
		<comments>http://weirdproductreviews.com/sprint-airave-gets-remixed-by-airvana-has-voip-landline-and-ev-do-support/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Apr 2010 20:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Ziegler</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[airave]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[airvana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Engadget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FCC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fcc approval]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[femtocell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[G MicroCell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microcell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nbsp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sourced]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sprint]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sprint airave]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[support]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Verizon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/05/sprint-airave-gets-remixed-by-airvana-has-voip-landline-and-ev/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center"><a href="https://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/oetcf/eas/reports/ViewExhibitReport.cfm?mode=Exhibits&#38;RequestTimeout=500&#38;calledFromFrame=N&#38;application_id=593827&#38;fcc_id=%27QHYHUBBUBC1600-RT"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/04/airave-manual-airvana.jpg" alt="" /></a></div>
The Samsung-sourced femtocell that Sprint and Verizon have been offering (as the <a href="http://engadget.com/tag/Airave/">Airave</a> and <a href="http://engadget.com/tag/WirelessNetworkExtender/">Wireless Network Extender</a>, respectively) is all well and good, but it's got one fatal flaw: unlike AT&#38;T's aptly-named <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/3GMicroCell/">3G MicroCell</a>, it doesn't have support for 3G data -- it's compatible with CDMA 1x alone. Verizon's fixing that later this year with an <a href="http://mobile.engadget.com/2010/01/09/samsungs-combo-femtocell-for-verizon-in-the-wild-at-ces/">updated model from Samsung</a>, but thanks to a fresh FCC filing, it looks like Sprint will be taking a different route by roping in Airvana for the Airave's successor. On top of EV-DO, the interesting bit about this puppy is that it supports a VoIP-routed landline connection around back; we're not sure whether Sprint actually plans on enabling this extra jack, but it's specifically mentioned in the draft manual, so we wouldn't doubt it. No word on a release just yet -- but FCC approval is frequently one of the last steps on a product's road to retail, so we might see it soon.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/05/sprint-airave-gets-remixed-by-airvana-has-voip-landline-and-ev/">Sprint Airave gets remixed by Airvana, has VoIP landline and EV-DO support</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Mon, 05 Apr 2010 15:13:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both;padding: 8px 0 0 0;height: 2px;font-size: 1px;border: 0;margin: 0;padding: 0"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/05/sprint-airave-gets-remixed-by-airvana-has-voip-landline-and-ev/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&#160;&#124;&#160;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19427174/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&#160;&#124;&#160;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/05/sprint-airave-gets-remixed-by-airvana-has-voip-landline-and-ev/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fweirdproductreviews.com%2Fsprint-airave-gets-remixed-by-airvana-has-voip-landline-and-ev-do-support%2F"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fweirdproductreviews.com%2Fsprint-airave-gets-remixed-by-airvana-has-voip-landline-and-ev-do-support%2F&amp;source=weirdproducts&amp;style=normal&amp;service_api=9a2672c57b911d5d8ce5a812b8d3995d" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<div style="text-align: center;"><a href="https://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/oetcf/eas/reports/ViewExhibitReport.cfm?mode=Exhibits&amp;RequestTimeout=500&amp;calledFromFrame=N&amp;application_id=593827&amp;fcc_id=%27QHYHUBBUBC1600-RT"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/04/airave-manual-airvana.jpg" alt="" /></a></div>
<p>The Samsung-sourced femtocell that Sprint and Verizon have been offering (as the <a href="http://engadget.com/tag/Airave/">Airave</a> and <a href="http://engadget.com/tag/WirelessNetworkExtender/">Wireless Network Extender</a>, respectively) is all well and good, but it&#8217;s got one fatal flaw: unlike AT&amp;T&#8217;s aptly-named <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/3GMicroCell/">3G MicroCell</a>, it doesn&#8217;t have support for 3G data &#8212; it&#8217;s compatible with CDMA 1x alone. Verizon&#8217;s fixing that later this year with an <a href="http://mobile.engadget.com/2010/01/09/samsungs-combo-femtocell-for-verizon-in-the-wild-at-ces/">updated model from Samsung</a>, but thanks to a fresh FCC filing, it looks like Sprint will be taking a different route by roping in Airvana for the Airave&#8217;s successor. On top of EV-DO, the interesting bit about this puppy is that it supports a VoIP-routed landline connection around back; we&#8217;re not sure whether Sprint actually plans on enabling this extra jack, but it&#8217;s specifically mentioned in the draft manual, so we wouldn&#8217;t doubt it. No word on a release just yet &#8212; but FCC approval is frequently one of the last steps on a product&#8217;s road to retail, so we might see it soon.
<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/05/sprint-airave-gets-remixed-by-airvana-has-voip-landline-and-ev/">Sprint Airave gets remixed by Airvana, has VoIP landline and EV-DO support</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Mon, 05 Apr 2010 15:13:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p>
<h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6>
<p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/05/sprint-airave-gets-remixed-by-airvana-has-voip-landline-and-ev/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19427174/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/05/sprint-airave-gets-remixed-by-airvana-has-voip-landline-and-ev/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://weirdproductreviews.com/sprint-airave-gets-remixed-by-airvana-has-voip-landline-and-ev-do-support/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Skype Mobile for Verizon on Android hands-on (with WiFi off)</title>
		<link>http://weirdproductreviews.com/skype-mobile-for-verizon-on-android-hands-on-with-wifi-off/</link>
		<comments>http://weirdproductreviews.com/skype-mobile-for-verizon-on-android-hands-on-with-wifi-off/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Mar 2010 13:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tim Stevens</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[amp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Android]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Engadget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FCC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[G. Early]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hounds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[impressions gallery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nbsp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Skype]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Verizon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WiFi]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/25/skype-mobile-for-verizon-on-android-hands-on-with-wifi-off/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/25/skype-mobile-for-verizon-on-android-hands-on-with-wifi-off/"><img hspace="4" border="1" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/03/skype-mobile-20100325-600-01-2.jpg" /></a></div>
It's been a little over a month since Verizon <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/16/verizon-to-allow-unlimited-skype-calling-over-3g-starting-next-m/">announced</a> it would unleash the VoIP hounds on select smartphones, an interesting move given AT&#38;T's <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/21/atandt-tells-the-fcc-it-had-no-role-in-removing-google-voice-fro/">wrangling with the FCC</a> over Google Voice and begrudging <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/06/atandt-now-allowing-iphone-voip-calls-over-3g/">approval of Skype over 3G</a>. Early this morning the Skype Mobile app hit the Android Marketplace for Verizon devices (and <em>only</em> Verizon devices), and while it does work on 3G, it curiously doesn't work on WiFi -- at all. Click on through for some screenshots and our impressions.<br />
<div class="postgallery"><p><strong>Gallery: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/skype-mobile-for-android/">Skype Mobile for Android</a></strong></p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/skype-mobile-for-android/#2832524"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/03/skype-mobile-20100325-800-07_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" /></a><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/skype-mobile-for-android/#2832518"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/03/skype-mobile-20100325-800-01_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" /></a><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/skype-mobile-for-android/#2832519"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/03/skype-mobile-20100325-800-02_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" /></a><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/skype-mobile-for-android/#2832520"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/03/skype-mobile-20100325-800-03_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" /></a><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/skype-mobile-for-android/#2832521"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/03/skype-mobile-20100325-800-04_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" /></a></div><p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/25/skype-mobile-for-verizon-on-android-hands-on-with-wifi-off/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Skype Mobile for Verizon on Android hands-on (with WiFi off)</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/25/skype-mobile-for-verizon-on-android-hands-on-with-wifi-off/">Skype Mobile for Verizon on Android hands-on (with WiFi off)</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Thu, 25 Mar 2010 08:14:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both;padding: 8px 0 0 0;height: 2px;font-size: 1px;border: 0;margin: 0;padding: 0"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/25/skype-mobile-for-verizon-on-android-hands-on-with-wifi-off/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&#160;&#124;&#160;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19413869/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&#160;&#124;&#160;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/25/skype-mobile-for-verizon-on-android-hands-on-with-wifi-off/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fweirdproductreviews.com%2Fskype-mobile-for-verizon-on-android-hands-on-with-wifi-off%2F"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fweirdproductreviews.com%2Fskype-mobile-for-verizon-on-android-hands-on-with-wifi-off%2F&amp;source=weirdproducts&amp;style=normal&amp;service_api=9a2672c57b911d5d8ce5a812b8d3995d" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<div style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/25/skype-mobile-for-verizon-on-android-hands-on-with-wifi-off/"><img hspace="4" border="1" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/03/skype-mobile-20100325-600-01-2.jpg" /></a></div>
<p>It&#8217;s been a little over a month since Verizon <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/16/verizon-to-allow-unlimited-skype-calling-over-3g-starting-next-m/">announced</a> it would unleash the VoIP hounds on select smartphones, an interesting move given AT&amp;T&#8217;s <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/21/atandt-tells-the-fcc-it-had-no-role-in-removing-google-voice-fro/">wrangling with the FCC</a> over Google Voice and begrudging <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/06/atandt-now-allowing-iphone-voip-calls-over-3g/">approval of Skype over 3G</a>. Early this morning the Skype Mobile app hit the Android Marketplace for Verizon devices (and <em>only</em> Verizon devices), and while it does work on 3G, it curiously doesn&#8217;t work on WiFi &#8212; at all. Click on through for some screenshots and our impressions.</p>
<div class="postgallery">
<p><strong>Gallery: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/skype-mobile-for-android/">Skype Mobile for Android</a></strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/skype-mobile-for-android/#2832524"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/03/skype-mobile-20100325-800-07_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/skype-mobile-for-android/#2832518"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/03/skype-mobile-20100325-800-01_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/skype-mobile-for-android/#2832519"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/03/skype-mobile-20100325-800-02_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/skype-mobile-for-android/#2832520"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/03/skype-mobile-20100325-800-03_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/skype-mobile-for-android/#2832521"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/03/skype-mobile-20100325-800-04_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a></div>
<p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/25/skype-mobile-for-verizon-on-android-hands-on-with-wifi-off/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Skype Mobile for Verizon on Android hands-on (with WiFi off)</em></a></p>
<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/25/skype-mobile-for-verizon-on-android-hands-on-with-wifi-off/">Skype Mobile for Verizon on Android hands-on (with WiFi off)</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Thu, 25 Mar 2010 08:14:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p>
<h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6>
<p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/25/skype-mobile-for-verizon-on-android-hands-on-with-wifi-off/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19413869/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/25/skype-mobile-for-verizon-on-android-hands-on-with-wifi-off/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://weirdproductreviews.com/skype-mobile-for-verizon-on-android-hands-on-with-wifi-off/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Apple iPad &#8212; model A1337 &#8212; phreaks the FCC</title>
		<link>http://weirdproductreviews.com/apple-ipad-model-a1337-phreaks-the-fcc/</link>
		<comments>http://weirdproductreviews.com/apple-ipad-model-a1337-phreaks-the-fcc/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 21:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Ziegler</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple iPad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Engadget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FCC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fcc approval]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fcc filings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fri]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gsm 850]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[launch window]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[model]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nbsp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pair]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sitch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[System]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/12/apple-ipad-model-a1337-phreaks-the-fcc/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center"><img border="0" vspace="4" hspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/03/apple-ipad-fcc-label.jpg" /></div>
A pair of <a href="http://engadget.com/tag/ipad">iPads</a> was just revealed in the FCC's system in perfect synchrony with that little <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/12/ipad-pre-order-is-go-will-you-buy-one/">pre-order sitch</a> with which you may or may not already be familiar. Apple, of course, has a track record of timing its FCC filings perfectly so that virtually nothing is revealed before Cupertino wants it to be, and frankly, you're not going to get much here that you didn't already know -- the photographs (both external and internal) and the user manual are all still under confidentiality. Both units were tested for WiFi 802.11a/b/g/n and Bluetooth, while one -- model number A1337 -- adds in GSM 850 / 1900 and UMTS 850 / 1900, so it appears that Apple has bundled all of its 3G and non-3G models into just two filings regardless of storage capacity. We caught A1337 flipping through an old issue of 2600, so for all we know, it socially engineered its way to FCC approval -- whatever it takes to make that late-April launch window, right?<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/12/apple-ipad-model-a1337-phreaks-the-fcc/">Apple iPad -- model A1337 -- phreaks the FCC</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Fri, 12 Mar 2010 16:17:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both;padding: 8px 0 0 0;height: 2px;font-size: 1px;border: 0;margin: 0;padding: 0"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/12/apple-ipad-model-a1337-phreaks-the-fcc/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&#160;&#124;&#160;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19397187/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&#160;&#124;&#160;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/12/apple-ipad-model-a1337-phreaks-the-fcc/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fweirdproductreviews.com%2Fapple-ipad-model-a1337-phreaks-the-fcc%2F"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fweirdproductreviews.com%2Fapple-ipad-model-a1337-phreaks-the-fcc%2F&amp;source=weirdproducts&amp;style=normal&amp;service_api=9a2672c57b911d5d8ce5a812b8d3995d" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<div style="text-align: center;"><img border="0" vspace="4" hspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/03/apple-ipad-fcc-label.jpg" /></div>
<p>A pair of <a href="http://engadget.com/tag/ipad">iPads</a> was just revealed in the FCC&#8217;s system in perfect synchrony with that little <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/12/ipad-pre-order-is-go-will-you-buy-one/">pre-order sitch</a> with which you may or may not already be familiar. Apple, of course, has a track record of timing its FCC filings perfectly so that virtually nothing is revealed before Cupertino wants it to be, and frankly, you&#8217;re not going to get much here that you didn&#8217;t already know &#8212; the photographs (both external and internal) and the user manual are all still under confidentiality. Both units were tested for WiFi 802.11a/b/g/n and Bluetooth, while one &#8212; model number A1337 &#8212; adds in GSM 850 / 1900 and UMTS 850 / 1900, so it appears that Apple has bundled all of its 3G and non-3G models into just two filings regardless of storage capacity. We caught A1337 flipping through an old issue of 2600, so for all we know, it socially engineered its way to FCC approval &#8212; whatever it takes to make that late-April launch window, right?
<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/12/apple-ipad-model-a1337-phreaks-the-fcc/">Apple iPad &#8212; model A1337 &#8212; phreaks the FCC</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Fri, 12 Mar 2010 16:17:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p>
<h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6>
<p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/12/apple-ipad-model-a1337-phreaks-the-fcc/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19397187/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/12/apple-ipad-model-a1337-phreaks-the-fcc/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://weirdproductreviews.com/apple-ipad-model-a1337-phreaks-the-fcc/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Verizon, AT&amp;T, Sprint, T-Mobile, and Google all respond to FCC&#8217;s ETF inquiry</title>
		<link>http://weirdproductreviews.com/verizon-att-sprint-t-mobile-and-google-all-respond-to-fccs-etf-inquiry/</link>
		<comments>http://weirdproductreviews.com/verizon-att-sprint-t-mobile-and-google-all-respond-to-fccs-etf-inquiry/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 00:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Ziegler</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[displeasure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[etf]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FCC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[grand total]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[inquiry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[planning stages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pragmatic approach]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[revenue stream]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[T-Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[termination fee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/23/verizon-atandt-sprint-t-mobile-and-google-all-respond-to-fccs/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://fcc.gov/"><img vspace="16" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadgetmobile.com/media/2007/05/fcclogo-2.jpg" alt="" /></a>All of the players roped into the FCC's <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/26/fcc-expands-etf-inquiry-fires-off-letters-to-atandt-sprint-t-mo/">early termination fee inquiry</a> -- T-Mobile, Sprint, AT&#38;T, Verizon, and Google -- have met the Fed's February 23 deadline for responding, and needless to say, you could destroy a small forest with the amount of paperwork that's been sent back to Washington. The majority of the inquiry focused on carriers' ETF pricing structure and whether there are different ETFs involved based on the device a customer chooses, and the subtleties in the differences between answers from different carriers are pretty fascinating.<br />
<br />
T-Mobile seems resolute that a single $200 ETF is the way to go and emphasizes that its customers can avoid the fee altogether by going with an Even More Plus plan, while Sprint says that it "continue[s] to evaluate the market" with regard to a multiple ETF setup. Google, meanwhile, is quick to note that it's just dropped its $350 Equipment Recovery Fee down to $150, though that amount still effectively represents the only device in T-Mobile's subsidized lineup that commands a grand total ETF greater than $200 upon cancellation -- but it gets even better later on when they get snippy for being lumped in with carriers on the inquiry and remind the FCC that the ERF reduction had been in the planning stages prior to the inquiry being issued. At any rate, they note that the ERF isn't intended as a revenue stream -- rather, it's a way to recoup the losses Google incurs when T-Mobile asks for its commission back if a customer cancels within 120 days (as you might imagine, T-Mobile conveniently fails to mention this point in its own reply).<br />
<br />
Verizon -- which effectively triggered this whole mess by introducing its two-tier ETF -- basically echoes much of what it said in its last response, a surprising move considering the Commission's <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/09/fcc-chariman-echoes-commissioners-sentiments-says-verizons-et/">general displeasure</a> with it, so it'll be interesting to see what kind of reaction it garners this time around. AT&#38;T takes perhaps the most pragmatic approach through most of its response, answering the FCC's questions very matter-of-factly, but goes into a great deal of depth rationalizing early termination fees at the tail end and takes the opportunity to remind everyone that they've offered both commitment-free month-to-month and prepaid service for many years.<br />
<br />
Something tells us this isn't the last we've heard on the subject, but for the time being, check out everyone's responses in the galleries below (more after the break).<br />
<br />
[Thanks, Dan P.]<br />
<div class="postgallery"><p><strong>Gallery: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/googles-response-to-fccs-etf-inquiries/">Google's response to FCC's ETF inquiries</a></strong></p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/googles-response-to-fccs-etf-inquiries/2736646/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/02/etfgoogle-rm-engpage1_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" /></a><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/googles-response-to-fccs-etf-inquiries/2736647/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/02/etfgoogle-rm-engpage2_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" /></a><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/googles-response-to-fccs-etf-inquiries/2736648/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/02/etfgoogle-rm-engpage3_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" /></a><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/googles-response-to-fccs-etf-inquiries/2736649/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/02/etfgoogle-rm-engpage4_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" /></a><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/googles-response-to-fccs-etf-inquiries/2736650/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/02/etfgoogle-rm-engpage5_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" /></a></div><br />
<div class="postgallery"><p><strong>Gallery: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/verizons-response-to-fccs-etf-inquiries/">Verizon's response to FCC's ETF inquiries</a></strong></p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/verizons-response-to-fccs-etf-inquiries/2736666/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/02/etfverizon-rm-engpage1_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" /></a><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/verizons-response-to-fccs-etf-inquiries/2736668/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/02/etfverizon-rm-engpage2_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" /></a><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/verizons-response-to-fccs-etf-inquiries/2736669/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/02/etfverizon-rm-engpage3_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" /></a><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/verizons-response-to-fccs-etf-inquiries/2736670/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/02/etfverizon-rm-engpage4_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" /></a><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/verizons-response-to-fccs-etf-inquiries/2736671/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/02/etfverizon-rm-engpage5_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" /></a></div><p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/23/verizon-atandt-sprint-t-mobile-and-google-all-respond-to-fccs/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Verizon, AT&#38;T, Sprint, T-Mobile, and Google all respond to FCC's ETF inquiry</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/23/verizon-atandt-sprint-t-mobile-and-google-all-respond-to-fccs/">Verizon, AT&#38;T, Sprint, T-Mobile, and Google all respond to FCC's ETF inquiry</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Tue, 23 Feb 2010 19:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both;padding: 8px 0 0 0;height: 2px;font-size: 1px;border: 0;margin: 0;padding: 0"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/23/verizon-atandt-sprint-t-mobile-and-google-all-respond-to-fccs/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&#160;&#124;&#160;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19370808/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&#160;&#124;&#160;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/23/verizon-atandt-sprint-t-mobile-and-google-all-respond-to-fccs/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fweirdproductreviews.com%2Fverizon-att-sprint-t-mobile-and-google-all-respond-to-fccs-etf-inquiry%2F"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fweirdproductreviews.com%2Fverizon-att-sprint-t-mobile-and-google-all-respond-to-fccs-etf-inquiry%2F&amp;source=weirdproducts&amp;style=normal&amp;service_api=9a2672c57b911d5d8ce5a812b8d3995d" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<p><a href="http://fcc.gov/"><img vspace="16" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadgetmobile.com/media/2007/05/fcclogo-2.jpg" alt="" /></a>All of the players roped into the FCC&#8217;s <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/26/fcc-expands-etf-inquiry-fires-off-letters-to-atandt-sprint-t-mo/">early termination fee inquiry</a> &#8212; T-Mobile, Sprint, AT&amp;T, Verizon, and Google &#8212; have met the Fed&#8217;s February 23 deadline for responding, and needless to say, you could destroy a small forest with the amount of paperwork that&#8217;s been sent back to Washington. The majority of the inquiry focused on carriers&#8217; ETF pricing structure and whether there are different ETFs involved based on the device a customer chooses, and the subtleties in the differences between answers from different carriers are pretty fascinating.</p>
<p>T-Mobile seems resolute that a single $200 ETF is the way to go and emphasizes that its customers can avoid the fee altogether by going with an Even More Plus plan, while Sprint says that it &#8220;continue[s] to evaluate the market&#8221; with regard to a multiple ETF setup. Google, meanwhile, is quick to note that it&#8217;s just dropped its $350 Equipment Recovery Fee down to $150, though that amount still effectively represents the only device in T-Mobile&#8217;s subsidized lineup that commands a grand total ETF greater than $200 upon cancellation &#8212; but it gets even better later on when they get snippy for being lumped in with carriers on the inquiry and remind the FCC that the ERF reduction had been in the planning stages prior to the inquiry being issued. At any rate, they note that the ERF isn&#8217;t intended as a revenue stream &#8212; rather, it&#8217;s a way to recoup the losses Google incurs when T-Mobile asks for its commission back if a customer cancels within 120 days (as you might imagine, T-Mobile conveniently fails to mention this point in its own reply).</p>
<p>Verizon &#8212; which effectively triggered this whole mess by introducing its two-tier ETF &#8212; basically echoes much of what it said in its last response, a surprising move considering the Commission&#8217;s <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/09/fcc-chariman-echoes-commissioners-sentiments-says-verizons-et/">general displeasure</a> with it, so it&#8217;ll be interesting to see what kind of reaction it garners this time around. AT&amp;T takes perhaps the most pragmatic approach through most of its response, answering the FCC&#8217;s questions very matter-of-factly, but goes into a great deal of depth rationalizing early termination fees at the tail end and takes the opportunity to remind everyone that they&#8217;ve offered both commitment-free month-to-month and prepaid service for many years.</p>
<p>Something tells us this isn&#8217;t the last we&#8217;ve heard on the subject, but for the time being, check out everyone&#8217;s responses in the galleries below (more after the break).</p>
<p>[Thanks, Dan P.]</p>
<div class="postgallery">
<p><strong>Gallery: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/googles-response-to-fccs-etf-inquiries/">Google&#8217;s response to FCC&#8217;s ETF inquiries</a></strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/googles-response-to-fccs-etf-inquiries/2736646/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/02/etfgoogle-rm-engpage1_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/googles-response-to-fccs-etf-inquiries/2736647/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/02/etfgoogle-rm-engpage2_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/googles-response-to-fccs-etf-inquiries/2736648/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/02/etfgoogle-rm-engpage3_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/googles-response-to-fccs-etf-inquiries/2736649/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/02/etfgoogle-rm-engpage4_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/googles-response-to-fccs-etf-inquiries/2736650/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/02/etfgoogle-rm-engpage5_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a></div>
<p></p>
<div class="postgallery">
<p><strong>Gallery: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/verizons-response-to-fccs-etf-inquiries/">Verizon&#8217;s response to FCC&#8217;s ETF inquiries</a></strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/verizons-response-to-fccs-etf-inquiries/2736666/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/02/etfverizon-rm-engpage1_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/verizons-response-to-fccs-etf-inquiries/2736668/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/02/etfverizon-rm-engpage2_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/verizons-response-to-fccs-etf-inquiries/2736669/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/02/etfverizon-rm-engpage3_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/verizons-response-to-fccs-etf-inquiries/2736670/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/02/etfverizon-rm-engpage4_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/verizons-response-to-fccs-etf-inquiries/2736671/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/02/etfverizon-rm-engpage5_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a></div>
<p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/23/verizon-atandt-sprint-t-mobile-and-google-all-respond-to-fccs/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Verizon, AT&amp;T, Sprint, T-Mobile, and Google all respond to FCC&#8217;s ETF inquiry</em></a></p>
<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/23/verizon-atandt-sprint-t-mobile-and-google-all-respond-to-fccs/">Verizon, AT&amp;T, Sprint, T-Mobile, and Google all respond to FCC&#8217;s ETF inquiry</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Tue, 23 Feb 2010 19:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p>
<h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6>
<p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/23/verizon-atandt-sprint-t-mobile-and-google-all-respond-to-fccs/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19370808/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/23/verizon-atandt-sprint-t-mobile-and-google-all-respond-to-fccs/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://weirdproductreviews.com/verizon-att-sprint-t-mobile-and-google-all-respond-to-fccs-etf-inquiry/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Microsoft&#8217;s PB10ZU (turtle) and PB20ZU Project Pink phones outed by FCC?</title>
		<link>http://weirdproductreviews.com/microsofts-pb10zu-turtle-and-pb20zu-project-pink-phones-outed-by-fcc/</link>
		<comments>http://weirdproductreviews.com/microsofts-pb10zu-turtle-and-pb20zu-project-pink-phones-outed-by-fcc/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Feb 2010 12:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Ricker</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barcelona]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bluetooth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dual band]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[evdo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FCC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jeremy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[launch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[model]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nbsp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pink]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rev. A]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sidekick]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[slider]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[turtle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wireframe]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/13/microsofts-pb10zu-aka-turtle-and-pb20zu-project-pink-phones/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center"><a href="https://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/oetcf/eas/reports/ViewExhibitReport.cfm?mode=Exhibits&#38;RequestTimeout=500&#38;calledFromFrame=N&#38;application_id=793354&#38;fcc_id='APYNAR0067'"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/02/pb10zu-vs-turtle-pink-phone.jpg" alt="" /></a></div>
Oops. Those two pics looks similar, eh? And if we're not mistaken, Microsoft's Pink phone is rumored to be <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/01/microsofts-pink-smartphone-to-be-microsoft-branded/">made by Sharp</a>. This wireframe for model PB10ZU just hit the FCC looking every bit the "<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/23/microsofts-pink-phones-revealed/">Turtle</a>" device that was leaked last year. Of course, seeing Sharp behind Pink is only natural since it was one of Danger's manufacturers of choice for the Sidekick -- a team wholly <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/11/microsoft-buys-danger-windows-mobile-sidekick-imminent/">ingested by Microsoft</a> a few years ago. Looking through the FCC docs we see that it's a slider with dual-band CDMA, EVDO Rev. A, Bluetooth, and 802.11b/g WiFi. We also see reference to a second model, the PB20ZU (aka, "<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/21/microsoft-turtle-and-pure-project-pink-phones-and-surface-tablet/">pure</a>"?), although that model is lacking any detail whatsoever. The tastiest of FCC docs are being withheld by request until March 29th -- right in line with a <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/25/microsoft-pink-targeting-teens-and-twenty-somethings-devices-la/">rumored spring launch</a>. Hopefully Microsoft will have more to say about Project Pink and Windows 7 devices here in Barcelona so stay tuned.<br />
<br />
[Thanks, Jeremy F.]<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/13/microsofts-pb10zu-aka-turtle-and-pb20zu-project-pink-phones/">Microsoft's PB10ZU (turtle) and PB20ZU Project Pink phones outed by FCC?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Sat, 13 Feb 2010 07:38:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both;padding: 8px 0 0 0;height: 2px;font-size: 1px;border: 0;margin: 0;padding: 0"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/13/microsofts-pb10zu-aka-turtle-and-pb20zu-project-pink-phones/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&#160;&#124;&#160;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19357103/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&#160;&#124;&#160;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/13/microsofts-pb10zu-aka-turtle-and-pb20zu-project-pink-phones/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fweirdproductreviews.com%2Fmicrosofts-pb10zu-turtle-and-pb20zu-project-pink-phones-outed-by-fcc%2F"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fweirdproductreviews.com%2Fmicrosofts-pb10zu-turtle-and-pb20zu-project-pink-phones-outed-by-fcc%2F&amp;source=weirdproducts&amp;style=normal&amp;service_api=9a2672c57b911d5d8ce5a812b8d3995d" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<div style="text-align: center;"><a href="https://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/oetcf/eas/reports/ViewExhibitReport.cfm?mode=Exhibits&amp;RequestTimeout=500&amp;calledFromFrame=N&amp;application_id=793354&amp;fcc_id='APYNAR0067'"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/02/pb10zu-vs-turtle-pink-phone.jpg" alt="" /></a></div>
<p>Oops. Those two pics looks similar, eh? And if we&#8217;re not mistaken, Microsoft&#8217;s Pink phone is rumored to be <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/01/microsofts-pink-smartphone-to-be-microsoft-branded/">made by Sharp</a>. This wireframe for model PB10ZU just hit the FCC looking every bit the &#8220;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/23/microsofts-pink-phones-revealed/">Turtle</a>&#8221; device that was leaked last year. Of course, seeing Sharp behind Pink is only natural since it was one of Danger&#8217;s manufacturers of choice for the Sidekick &#8212; a team wholly <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/11/microsoft-buys-danger-windows-mobile-sidekick-imminent/">ingested by Microsoft</a> a few years ago. Looking through the FCC docs we see that it&#8217;s a slider with dual-band CDMA, EVDO Rev. A, Bluetooth, and 802.11b/g WiFi. We also see reference to a second model, the PB20ZU (aka, &#8220;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/21/microsoft-turtle-and-pure-project-pink-phones-and-surface-tablet/">pure</a>&#8220;?), although that model is lacking any detail whatsoever. The tastiest of FCC docs are being withheld by request until March 29th &#8212; right in line with a <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/25/microsoft-pink-targeting-teens-and-twenty-somethings-devices-la/">rumored spring launch</a>. Hopefully Microsoft will have more to say about Project Pink and Windows 7 devices here in Barcelona so stay tuned.</p>
<p>[Thanks, Jeremy F.]
<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/13/microsofts-pb10zu-aka-turtle-and-pb20zu-project-pink-phones/">Microsoft&#8217;s PB10ZU (turtle) and PB20ZU Project Pink phones outed by FCC?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Sat, 13 Feb 2010 07:38:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p>
<h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6>
<p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/13/microsofts-pb10zu-aka-turtle-and-pb20zu-project-pink-phones/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19357103/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/13/microsofts-pb10zu-aka-turtle-and-pb20zu-project-pink-phones/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://weirdproductreviews.com/microsofts-pb10zu-turtle-and-pb20zu-project-pink-phones-outed-by-fcc/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
